Mostly Books ... wildlife ... politics and everything between
Friday, 6 March 2026
Jacksons, Monk & Rowe and the Brodsky Quartet the formative years by Jacqueline Thomas
Friday, 2 January 2026
Didn't you used to be Chris Mullin - Diaries 2010 - 2022
This is a delightful and insightful read !
This came as no surprise to me as I read some of his earlier diaries some years ago. These diaries were just as interesting a read as the earlier ones, although in a rather different way. The earlier diaries spanned a time when Chris Mullin was a Labout MP for Sunderland and a good deal of the content related to the period of Tony Blair's leadership. He refers to Blair as 'The Man' which is a nice device and reflects something of his opinion of Blair. This involves quite a mix of feelings from admiration of Blair's rhetorical skills to seeing the more fickle side of him. These earlier diaries gave a close reflection of those in power at the time which I found gave me a considered view of events and of the main political players of that time who featured in contemporaneous news reports that I remember. In effect an historical retrospective.
This volume of diaries relates to the time when Chris Mullin was no longer an MP but had acquired considerable renown and financial reward for his various books and screen adaptations. So while they lack the close reflection on the current politicians they deal with more recent events and give a wider perspective of his life as a Booker Prize judge, National Parks Authority Committee member and member of his local and historical community.
There is a good del of humour in the diaries. One comment that amused me was his reflection of times when his wife travelled abroad which left him free to do whatever he liked without having to account for his actions. Although the diaries received an edit, this was clearly of a very light touch and his reactions and feelings remain true to the time.
One rather troubling event is where West Midlands Police bring legal action against him for refusing to reveal the source of some evidence that was used in the freeing of the wrongfully imprisoned Birmingham Six. His journalistic preservation of confidential source material prevailed and he was aquitted, this does not make me view the police in a better light.
He is a person for whom I have great admiration. As a Remainer he was MP fro a constituency which voted strongly for Brexit. He represented a community which had a prevailing hatred of foreigners despite many of them never having met one - they formed their views from the Right Wing Tabloid press.
Saturday, 13 December 2025
Betrayal - The Murder of Robert Nairac GC by Alistair Kerr
The loan was inspired by my having read a biography of Paddy Mayne, the SAS war hero which I had lent to my friend. I consequently had something of a degree of interest in military history.
I found this book completely fascinating. It is incredibly well researched and running to over 400 pages it includes much peripheral context. From it I gleaned insight into the history and individual style of the Oxford Colleges and how it was for people hoping to gain entrance to these in the late 1960s which was the same time that I was engaging in University entrance. The author is very much of the opinion that standards have fallen since those times and that the liberalisation that has taken place over that half century is very much a bad thing. I have some sympathy with his views on standards but mine relate more to scientific rigour rather than the cultural democritisation that he rails against. His views differ from mine in other spheres but more on that later.
When one has lived through a certain time and listened to media reports in a very immediate way it can be difficult to form a properly informed view of events. It has been very educatioal to read of the events of 'The Troubles' in Northern Ireland in a retrospective fashion. It was clearly an incredibly complex picture of the interaction of the British Army, the SAS, and the RUC, all of which should have had a common purpose but which had different priorities and restraints. For example the Army personel were there for a time limited period whereas the RUC were operating there centrally to their lives - there was no exit plan for them. Similarly the PIRA and OIRA operated to different standards and with different levels of violence and restraint.
Political angles are explored and the author is clearly very right wing and has got nothing good to say about labour poloitcians: Harold Wilson is treated in a particularly excoriating way. The Political Left are roundly condemned.
The analysis of events is forensic and fair. Much has been written about the events of the murder and much is incorrect. Some of this stems from some of the protagonists' attempts at damage limitation and avoidance of reputational damage. The author navigates his way through all this in a fascinatingly robust fashion and left me, as the reader feeling that the truth as far as it could be ascertained had been arrived it.
It is a thoroughly good read that left me feeling unlikely to be very satisfied with pretty much anything that I might read next.
Thursday, 27 November 2025
How they Broke Britain by James O'Brien
Thursday, 6 November 2025
If Russia Wins A Scenario by Carlo Masala
Saturday, 25 October 2025
The Meaning of Geese by Nick Acheson
I started reading this book at the end of last winter just as the wintering geese on the Solway were departing for their breeding grounds. I was so enthralled by the content and so much liked the direct but nevertheless lyrical writing style that I temporarily shelved it. This was because I wanted to be immersed in my local north Cumbrian wintering flocks of geese while reading it. The past few weeks have seen vast flocks of Barnacle Geese return to the Solway from their Svalbard breeding grounds and returning Pink-footed Geese from where they breed in Iceland. The scene was now set for me to finish the book.
This book is generally to be found under the 'Nature Writing' section in bookshops. This category is one with which I have some difficulty. I would have a preference for placing it somewhere that reflects its degree of specialisation and authority. This is no run of the mill 'Nature book'. It is interesting and probably significant that while Nick has written columns in some prestigious publications this is actually his first book.
The form that the book takes is by progressing through the winter starting in September with the earliest arrivals of geese and concludes at the end of April when most have departed. It recounts Nick's journeys on an old red bicycle around the lanes of north Norfolk as he searches for flocks of geese. He is a native of that part of Norfolk and keeps in contact with James McCallum that wonderful water colourist whose speciality is geese and also with a few other knowledgeable observers and ringers of geese.
The narrative while being based on Nick's travels around his local area also brings in a wealth of information related to when the different species of geese arrive and depart and also where their core breeding areas are located. The whole text comes across as being completely honest; it is sprinkled with details that give atmosphere while it never seems forced or includes unnecessary embelishment.
This is undoubledly one of the most enjoyable, inspiring and informative accounts that I have read. I would have little hesitation in awarding it my wildlife related book of the year.
Monday, 20 October 2025
The Kremlin's Noose by Amy Knight
I have long had a fascination with Russia from reading Sholokhov novels in the late 1960s to several visits to Russia in the 1990s including sailing out of Vladivostok on a fishing boat into Peter The Great Bay and passing by the Russian fleet in complete openness. How times have changed.
This book was a delight ! The author is an authority on Russian politics with a PhD in the subject from the LSE where she later taught and followed that by a couple of decades at the US Library of Congress as a specialist in Russian and Soviet affairs. The writing is good and clear and marred by the only occasional 'gotten'.
The book traces Putin's career from his rather less than prestigious days as a KGB Colonel through to his apparently reluctant appointment as Russia's President under Yeltsin's direction up to the present time. It is not just about Putin however. It gives us insights into the complex manoeuvrings of Russian politics with a dizzying array of players who rise and fall with an intensity that makes British politics seem incredibly civilised in comparison. The falls are in a different league from those that we see within western politics - exiles, killings and apparent suicides predominate and the advice not to drink the tea is less of a cliche than a stark reality.
It was interesting to be reminded that Yeltsin was a real advocate for democracy and that Russia was heading in a very good direction in those days when we felt that the world offered real optimism. Even Putin's early days as President involved constructive meetings with western leaders. How did it all go so wrong ? The idea that Russians have a slave mentality was suggested as being a contributory factor and that brings to mind the frustration shown by the protagonist in The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists.
I was puzzled by the reference to the US Congress adopting the Magnitski Act by a surpisingly reluctant Obama. This act had been promoted by Bill Browder who writes persuasively of its value - so why the reluctance ? Perhaps I have much to learn !
Despite the clearly negative tale that is told of the Russian decline into authoritarianism this was nevertheless a very uplifting read that showed the command and understanding that the author brought to the subject and the way that she conveyed it so eloquently.
Sunday, 19 October 2025
In Search of One Last Song by Parrick Galbraith
Wednesday, 1 October 2025
Not another one - podcast
This represents an unusual departure form the usual content of this blog in not being a book. It does satisfy the disclaimer 'Mostly' and certainly conforms to the stated content in that it is a political podcast.
I find politics a difficult sphere to understand and one in which it is difficulkt to get meaningful perspectives. I don't find the BBC particularly insightful although I did enjoy Politics Live for a time when Jo Coburn was in the chair. The printed press and online political platforms are generally highly partisan.
I had quite a long period of enthusiasm for the podcast Oh God What Now particularly when Ian Dunt, Dorian Lynskey, Alex Andreou and Ros Taylor where regular panelists. This podcast arose from the former Remainiacs. Then times changed and the cast became less to my liking. Beyond that I grew aware of the 'echo chamber' element of this along with so many other platforms. A wider perspective on the world of politics seemed an important thing to look for.
'Not another one' references Brenda from Bristol in her response to the news of another impending election. This is not particularly pertinent but it does give a flavour of the podcast which includes a nice thread of humour. The main tenet is to provide a cross section of political thought and for the discussions among the team members to be completely respectful.
The four protagonists shown in the image are, from left to right -
Tim Montgomerie. A former Tory and indeed the creator of the website ConservativeHome. He has written for most of the major broadsheets and has had advisor roles for the Tory party. He has recently Joined Reform.
Miranda Green. Writes for the FT and had former politcal roles within the LibDem party. She brings a lively ingredient to the podcast.
Steve Richards. A well known political journalist with a history with the BBC, Guardian, Independent and the New Statesman. He runs a very good podcast 'Rock and Roll Politics'.
Iain Martin. Has links with the Times and Telegraph. He also brings a wine buff element and advocates Co-op wine choices.
So here we have two shades of the right in Tim Montgomerie and Iain Martin and two shades of the left in Steve Richards and Miranda Green.
I find the episodes refreshingly lively and they give a broad political perspective. It is stimulating to hear political views that don't align with my own interrogated and all this in very good humour.
Wednesday, 24 September 2025
The Naked Neanderthal by Ludovic Slimak
Sunday, 14 September 2025
The Screaming Sky by Carles Foster
Tuesday, 9 September 2025
Hiking with Nietzsche by John Kaag
Sunday, 7 September 2025
The Challenges of Democracy and the Rule of Law by Jonathan Sumption
I picked this book up on a recent visit to Cogito Books very much on impulse and based largely on a general interest in the subject and also having heard the author speak on the R4 Today programme.
It was not an easy read and much less so than I had expected. I found myself rereading sentences more often than I would have liked. While it is clearly intended for a general rather than a legal audience there are rather frequent legalese turns of phrase that I found rather unclear on many occasions. It was not all bad news however and many of the issues that he raises were fascinating and insightful.
The idea that democracies are vulnerable mainly from within came as something of a surprise but he supports that view quite eloquently. Jonathan tells us that we in Britain expect much more protection from the state than was once the case; we have become more risk averse. This leads governments to make decisions based on what the public is likely to blame them for rather than what is best for society. He clearly takes a very critical view of the covid lockdowns and describes the approach as Hobbsian.
While considering democracy he warns us that autocracy which is what many democracies degenrate into is a very bad form of government and often leads to quick and bad decision making. This argument counters the often held view that democracy leads to paralysis and indecisive measures being taken.
There are some interesting elements of conflict discussed - that of morality versus consent for instance. This amounts to the dichotomy between the moral ideal and what is acceptable to the populace. Privacy and security are in similar conflict. He frames the undesirable result of the winning of 'consent' over 'morality' as 'majoritarian tyranny' - shades of Brexit perhaps ?











