How they Broke Britain by James O'Brien

 

When I came across this book all those months ago in Gairloch I was very much in two minds as to whether I wanted to read more about the woes that Britain is suffering and who was responsible.  It has taken a while for it to get to the top of my reading list.

The book starts with chapters on the right wing press from Murdoch to Andrew Neil and then gets onto politicians.  The early chapters I found rather dull and overly complex with multiple characters that I was not particularly familiar with.  The writing seemed to jump about leaving me wondering just who was being discussed at the time on many ocasions.  I was unimpressed and uninspired and felt a distinct sense that I was getting little from the book.

As the chapters turned to political figures with Farage being the first to feature it did'nt draw my attention much more.  Then as David Cameron entered the narrative I suddenly felt a sense of engagement - it became fascinating.  I wonder to what degree this was related to my own areas of interest or did the author suddenly become enlivened.

James writes about Cameron's background, the Bullingdon Club and the general sense of entitlement that stems from the elitist education that he and others of his ilk went through.  The content here was not particularly new to me but the analysis was fresh and engaging.

The next chapter dealing with Jeremy Corbyn had me even more enlightened.  It still puzzles me why so many people whom I regard as being well informed and critically thinking were so impressed by Corbyn.  It was interesting to read how figures such as Gordon Brown were concerned about his ascendency.  The background to Corbyn's association with jihadists gave me perspective on the concerns that many expressed about his sense of judgement.  I also learned that his team went to great lengths to keep him away from serious political interviewers for fear that the flaws in his policies might be exposed.

The remaining chapters on Johnson and Truss simply reinforced the views that I already had on these two.  His analysis of Johnson is particularly excoriating and frames him as being entirely driven by self interest.

It was after all a worthwhile read while not being an exceptional one.